Hydraulicspneumatics 869 201309 Abs Testing
Hydraulicspneumatics 869 201309 Abs Testing
Hydraulicspneumatics 869 201309 Abs Testing
Hydraulicspneumatics 869 201309 Abs Testing
Hydraulicspneumatics 869 201309 Abs Testing

Troubleshooting Challenge: ABS testing setup needed low pressure

Sept. 6, 2013
A supplier of ABS cycle testing machines could only maintain a pressure accurately down to around 75 psi.

A supplier of anti-lock braking system (ABS) control modules was competing for a contract to supply the braking system for a newly designed hybrid vehicle. The vehicle manufacturer specified that the new design had to be cycle tested at several different pressures. This was a normal specification, but one of the test pressures had to be only 15 psi, with a tolerance of ±1 psi.

The ABS supplier’s existing cycle testing machine could only maintain a pressure accurately down to around 75 psi. It incorporated a proportionally controlled pressure reducing valve and a pressure transducer to provide a feedback signal to close the control loop.

The supplier’s designers researched various proportional pressure controls but could not find any brand that could meet their 15 psi needs. A consultant spent some time looking into the design and recommended using a bleed-off system incorporating a directly operated relief. However, this circuit was unreliable and sensitive to temperature changes and pressure spikes.

Any idea how this problem was solved?

Solution to problem:

Pressure reducing valves require a minimum pressure differential across their ports to operate properly. This differential pressure required by most valves limits the minimum pressure they can obtain and hold accurately. The ABS supplier needed an unusually low pressure of 15 psi — far below the minimum 75 psi they could maintain with their current system.

Aside from its inability to accurately work at pressures down to 15 psi, the testing system was well designed and reliable. We suggested they just add a 65 psi check valve in line after the pressure reducing valve’s outlet to provide an additional pressure drop, thereby reducing the outlet pressure to the needed 15 psi. Such a simple idea, but it did the trick!

About the Author

Bob Sheaf | President

Robert J. Sheaf Jr., is the founder and president of CFC Insustrial Training, formerly Certified Fluid Consultants, part of CFC-Solar Inc. CFC-Solar provides technical training, consulting, and field services to any industry using fluid power technology. 

Continue Reading

Motor leakage variations

Oct. 18, 2006
affect low-speed performance

The Impacts of Electrification on Fluid Power Systems

May 15, 2023
Electrification presents challenges as well as opportunities to re-evaluate and improve upon the design of hydraulics and pneumatics.

Sponsored Recommendations

7 Key Considerations for Selecting a Medical Pump

Feb. 6, 2024
Newcomers to medical device design may think pressure and flow rate are sufficient parameters whenselecting a pump. While this may be true in some industrial applications, medical...

How Variable Volume Pumps Work

Feb. 6, 2024
Variable volume pumps, also known as precision dispense pumps, are a positive displacement pump that operates by retracting a piston to aspirate a fluid and then extending the...

What is a Check Valve and How Does it Work?

Feb. 6, 2024
Acheck valve, a non-return or one-way valve, is a mechanical device that allows a gas or liquid to flow freely in one direction while preventing reverse flow in the opposite ...

The Difference Between Calibrated Orifices and Holes

Feb. 6, 2024
Engineers tasked with managing fluid flow talk about both holes and calibrated orifices, but they are two distinct entities. A hole can be any opening, but a calibrated orifice...